<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Prompting on SciDraft | A Hugo Theme</title><link>https://www.zhumengyao.com/scidraft/tags/prompting/</link><description>Recent content in Prompting on SciDraft | A Hugo Theme</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:55:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.zhumengyao.com/scidraft/tags/prompting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Survey of Chain-of-Thought Prompting: Single Chains, Sampling and Demonstration Construction (survey)</title><link>https://www.zhumengyao.com/scidraft/notes/demo-note-survey-chain-of-thought/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:55:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://www.zhumengyao.com/scidraft/notes/demo-note-survey-chain-of-thought/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Demo note.&lt;/strong&gt; This note demonstrates what the &lt;strong&gt;SciDraft&lt;/strong&gt; Hugo theme can do
for academic and scientific publishing — for research institutions, researchers
and students. Its content is demonstration material only: readers should ignore
whether the demo content is correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chain-of-thought prompting began as a single sentence appended to a prompt and is
now a family of strategies that differ in what they add: a fixed reasoning
skeleton, several sampled chains and a vote, demonstrations the method writes for
itself, or calls to an external tool in the middle of the reasoning. This survey
groups the entries in its bibliography by that question, following the framing of
the earlier survey of prompting strategies \cite{Yu2023-qr}, and asks in each
group what the reported gain is actually attributed to.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>